Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Preview — Objectivism by Leonard Peikoff. This brilliantly conceived and organized book is Dr.
Get A Copy. Paperback , pages. Published December 1st by Plume first published December 9th More Details Original Title. Other Editions Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about Objectivism , please sign up.
Lists with This Book. Community Reviews. Showing Rating details. More filters. Sort order. Shelves: atheism , philosophy. This is by far the most systematic explanation of Objectivism anyone is ever likely to get. While there is nothing here that can't be found in Ayn Rand's numerous essays and fictional novels this book collects all of the thoughts and puts them in order so that they are easier to understand for those who are new to Objectivism.
For those who don't know what Objectivism is I will try to provide a brief explanation here.
Objectivism is the philosophy of writer and philosopher Ayn Rand. Rand created This is by far the most systematic explanation of Objectivism anyone is ever likely to get. Rand created it while writing "The Fountainhead" and "Atlas Shrugged", which are fictional novels driven by heroes who follow a different set of ideals than those espoused by the current society both then and now.
The philosophy has five bases. First, that existence exists independently of our minds. Secondly, that our senses and our minds are not faulty but completely healthy and competent tools for perceiving existence. This does not mean that the tools are PERFECT; if they were we would not need to invent tools to enhance our perceptions such as microscopes, telescopes, x-rays, etc.
Instead it simply means that unless there is a physical defect with our senses they do in fact feed us accurate data about the world. Thirdly, all living organisms, including humans, act for their own survival. Thus the standard for all of our actions should be our own survival, as opposed to our own self destruction. Fourthly, all human beings are independent individuals by nature and should be treated as such.
The violation of other human beings' independence through the use of force is anti-life and therefore immoral. Last, but not least, the human mind needs models to look up to, an embodied set of ideals that we can contemplate to inspire ourselves to heroic heights in our daily lives. Such is the proper function of art. This is all explained in detail, step by step, starting with the most basic observations and building to the final conclusions which I don't have nearly enough space to do here. So if these ideas are in any way intriguing, whether because you agree or disagree, I would recommend you read this book.
Some people, having heard all sorts of slanders and slurs of Ayn Rand and her work without ever having taken the opportunity to read it may be leary of picking this book up.
- Silvia, Lucia And Pascal (Part Two) (The Way We Live Now Book 7).
- 2. Independence?
- How to Pregnant-Proof your Teenager.
- Of Top Hats and Thieves.
Just keep in mind that people who try to prevent you from seeing something generally have a vested interest in doing so. Are such people afraid that their own ideas are easily proven wrong and therefore the only way to convince people to follow them is to keep them away from all other ideas? I would strongly encourage people to read the book for themselves and make up their own minds, rather than relying on the judgments of others. I would especially recommend this book to those who are already committed atheists.
Because Rand's philosophy is based on an objective universe, it rejects outright any claim to the supernatural. Furthermore, her philosophy, and Peikoff's formulation in particular, offers unique philosophical arguments against religion which can't be found anywhere else. For instance, it explains why atheists Stalin and Mao were every bit as oppressive and evil as their religious counterparts a common argument from Christians which I have found few, if any, atheists able to accurately argue against.
For those who may not be interested in plain philosophy and technical arguments I would recommend "The Fountainhead" and "Atlas Shrugged" which contain the same ideas expressed through characters and their actions the most ideal means of expressing them in Rand's view. Mar 02, sologdin rated it did not like it Shelves: nuke-from-orbit-only-way-to-be-sure , fascists-wtf , randitis. Second supplemental to multi-part review series.
Ayn Rand was not a systematic thinker or writer, so Peikoff must serve as her interpreter, drawing together into a relatively coherent whole her disparate, repetitive tantrums that randomly re-surface like Whac-a-Mole on crack rock. Peikoff is much more charming than Rand, too, which is a virtue. But precisely because all of Objectivism is presented here in a centralized narrative, it becomes vulnerable to a decapitation strike. Let Objectivism be Second supplemental to multi-part review series. Key to Objectivism is the confrontation with Evil. Draw out the pronunciation like Mermaidman to get the full effect: Eeeeeevilllllle!
The confrontation can go two ways: force or non-force.https://cistohealthmixgo.tk
Objectivism (Ayn Rand) - Wikipedia
We do not seek to preserve the present system, but to change it at the root. Fascists conceive of the nation as an organism, shaped by historic, cultural, and in some cases, ethnic and hereditary factors, a mythic construct incompatible with liberal, conservative, and communist theories of society. The fascist process of national regeneration demands radical measures to create or assert national validity and strength. In terms of form, fascism arises out of the perceived crisis of liberalism, with the assistance of traditional rightwing groups, under threat from an alleged leftwing menace, during the period of mass politics 42 ff.
Rebirth of the US through revolution is equivalent to saving Rome, saving the world, even. They disagree with socialists, liberals, conservatives. Force in this conception is the action of the state against individual rights, even when authorized by electoral process, carried out by bureaucrats. Objectivism assumes a mythic independent, free-willed individual, who not only freely chooses actions, but freely chooses thoughts, beliefs, desires, whether to focus the mind, whether to be rational.
It is a religion beyond all others in its lack of rigor. This free independent individual is oppressed by the state--we know from Rand that the industrialist is the most oppressed creature in the world--urged by looters, moochers, evaders, parasites, ivory tower intellectuals, scheming public servants, criminals, communists--the League of Evil that hates the good because it is good. The victims must reclaim the state, boycott the Evil, and retaliate against the initiators of force--the altruists.
They are obsessed with the imagined decline and humiliation of the large industrialist, placing modern transnational corporations into nostalgic relation with the robber barons. They wish to purify capitalism of decadent and false democratic rights to return to the mythologized golden age of the 19th century.
Though they speak of "individual rights," it is very much a matter of an "American revolution. Though Objectivism adopts an ersatz liberalism with its "individual rights" language, it actually only recognizes the right to property, which it regards as absolute, not subject to democratic adjustment. This is evidence therefore of a profound illiberalism, as is the complete contempt for egalitarianism, which was an essential component of classical liberalism ab initio.
Objectivism (Ayn Rand)
At no point does Objectivism engage with Locke, Montesquieu, or any other Enlightenment figures. That Objectivism regards subjects of dictatorship as living dead--zombies to be assassinated casually--and that it considers the slightest corruption of any part to extend to complete corruption of the whole, it is fair to state that it regards the subjects of the mixed economy to be similarly zombified, subject to the same retaliation by property-owners that might be exercised against criminals, bureaucrats, looters, moochers, communists, and so on.
Any platitudes about individual rights for everyone should be taken in this context, in which the Objectivist "obligation to lie" is triggered: we should assume that anything sounding remotely palatable is a strategic lie-against-the-initiator-of-force. What remains after the lying is bracketed: a hobbesian war of all against all--the telos that Objectivism appears to desire. Conclusion Based on the above and foregoing, we find that the world would undoubtedly come to a horrifying end in Objectivist hands. I accordingly declare any and all Objectivists to be hostis humani generis.
Recommended for those who feel the glee of the destroyer, the mind-hater, the nihilist; walking corpses who have just consigned themselves to the void; and subverters of every rational virtue. View all 20 comments. Feb 02, Aase Maren rated it it was amazing. I thought this was a very good book. I disagree with the fundamentals, but the book does exactly what you expect, and does it really well.
Five stars because I disagree with the notion of giving a low rating to a book about objectivism on the grounds that it's a book about objectivism. May 11, Gary Beauregard Bottomley rated it did not like it. I didn't know how convoluted and inane Ayn Rand's so called philosophy really was until I read this book. She makes the author of this book her "intellectual heir". That's spooky, but that gives me the opportunity to attack Ayn Rand and not the author of the book.
Both books were a slog to wade through and I didn't know how convoluted and inane Ayn Rand's so called philosophy really was until I read this book.
Both books were a slog to wade through and both had similar absolutist perspectives on the world which bordered on nuttiness. I understand Objectivism now after having read this book. There is a reason why philosophers ignore it, and wanna be intellectual high schoolers embrace it. It's so much nicer to see the world in absolutes and divide the world into black and white as Ayn Rand does with her philosophy than it is to actually understand the complexity of the world and actually make complex decisions using all the tools at our disposal instead of a one dimensional world view such as this book does and such as "The Purpose Driven Life" did.
Unfortunately, we don't life in a comic book and there are nuances to our world and neither book provides any insight beyond bromides. Her philosophy and I hate using that word to characterize it covers metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, philosophy, politics and aesthetics. Each topic is explained exactly as a sixth grader would cover it.